https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433238 The Court quashed the charge memo issued to the petitioner, as there was no loss of revenue and the contractors had paid outstanding dues. The assessment order was initially quashed and remanded for fresh consideration, but no new order was issued. The Court directed the respondents to provide evidence of tax liability by the contractors. The Assessing Officer re-affirmed the earlier assessment order, and it was concluded that the petitioner could not be held guilty. The Court decided to quash the charge memo, as no useful purpose would be served by disciplinary proceedings, considering the petitioner's innocence and the closure of the FIR against the contractors. en-us Mon, 09 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Jan 2023 20:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433238 The Court quashed the charge memo issued to the petitioner, as there was no loss of revenue and the contractors had paid outstanding dues. The assessment order was initially quashed and remanded for fresh consideration, but no new order was issued. The Court directed the respondents to provide evidence of tax liability by the contractors. The Assessing Officer re-affirmed the earlier assessment order, and it was concluded that the petitioner could not be held guilty. The Court decided to quash the charge memo, as no useful purpose would be served by disciplinary proceedings, considering the petitioner's innocence and the closure of the FIR against the contractors. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 09 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433238