<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 1137 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306381</link>
    <description>Royalty-like receipts from foreign cinematographic film distribution agreements were held not taxable in India as business income where the same contractual arrangement had already been accepted in the assessee&#039;s favour in earlier years. The Tribunal noted that, absent any distinguishing facts, non-resident income can be taxed only to the extent attributable to a permanent establishment, and no attributable Indian profits were shown from a dependent agent permanent establishment. The addition was therefore deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2023 21:23:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 1137 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306381</link>
      <description>Royalty-like receipts from foreign cinematographic film distribution agreements were held not taxable in India as business income where the same contractual arrangement had already been accepted in the assessee&#039;s favour in earlier years. The Tribunal noted that, absent any distinguishing facts, non-resident income can be taxed only to the extent attributable to a permanent establishment, and no attributable Indian profits were shown from a dependent agent permanent establishment. The addition was therefore deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>