https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306371 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a subsidiary of Lindstrom OY Finland, in a case concerning the classification of its activity and the applicability of service tax. The Tribunal held that the appellant did not transfer effective control of the workwear to clients, thus not falling under "Supply of Tangible Goods Service" or a "Declared Service." The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, allowing the appellant's appeal and setting aside the impugned order. The decision remained in favor of the appellant as the Revenue's appeal to the Supreme Court did not have a stay order. en-us Mon, 23 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Feb 2023 16:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306371 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a subsidiary of Lindstrom OY Finland, in a case concerning the classification of its activity and the applicability of service tax. The Tribunal held that the appellant did not transfer effective control of the workwear to clients, thus not falling under "Supply of Tangible Goods Service" or a "Declared Service." The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, allowing the appellant's appeal and setting aside the impugned order. The decision remained in favor of the appellant as the Revenue's appeal to the Supreme Court did not have a stay order. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 23 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306371