<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 1356 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306367</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and partly allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal, directing the AO/TPO to recompute the ALP of the international transaction. The Tribunal upheld the exclusion of comparables based on functional dissimilarity and directed the inclusion of specific companies, aligning with consistent judicial decisions. The order was pronounced on 21st Oct 2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2023 10:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702650" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 1356 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306367</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal and partly allowed the revenue&#039;s appeal, directing the AO/TPO to recompute the ALP of the international transaction. The Tribunal upheld the exclusion of comparables based on functional dissimilarity and directed the inclusion of specific companies, aligning with consistent judicial decisions. The order was pronounced on 21st Oct 2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306367</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>