<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1910 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306373</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the writ petitions, set aside the assessment orders, and remitted the matters back to the respondent for reevaluation, emphasizing the necessity of providing the petitioner with an opportunity for a personal hearing based on a precedent highlighting the importance of personal hearings in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2023 19:59:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1910 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306373</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the writ petitions, set aside the assessment orders, and remitted the matters back to the respondent for reevaluation, emphasizing the necessity of providing the petitioner with an opportunity for a personal hearing based on a precedent highlighting the importance of personal hearings in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306373</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>