<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 1390 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306377</link>
    <description>The Court quashed the impugned order and directed the petitioner to file a fresh application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act. The Court clarified that since the order was passed before the Deed of Assignment, the provisions of Section 5(4) did not apply, requiring the petitioner to seek assistance through a new application for debt recovery.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2023 19:59:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702643" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 1390 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306377</link>
      <description>The Court quashed the impugned order and directed the petitioner to file a fresh application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act. The Court clarified that since the order was passed before the Deed of Assignment, the provisions of Section 5(4) did not apply, requiring the petitioner to seek assistance through a new application for debt recovery.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306377</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>