<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 980 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433233</link>
    <description>HC ruled that investigation against appellant should be completed promptly, emphasizing distinction between &quot;risky exporter&quot; tag and formal adjudication. Court directed authorities to review representation within 15 days, provide fair hearing, and pass lawful order. Procedural timelines were critically examined, ensuring administrative actions do not unfairly restrict export activities based on unresolved suspicions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2025 13:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702616" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 980 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433233</link>
      <description>HC ruled that investigation against appellant should be completed promptly, emphasizing distinction between &quot;risky exporter&quot; tag and formal adjudication. Court directed authorities to review representation within 15 days, provide fair hearing, and pass lawful order. Procedural timelines were critically examined, ensuring administrative actions do not unfairly restrict export activities based on unresolved suspicions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433233</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>