<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 980 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433233</link>
    <description>The circular on risky exporter cases required the authorities to decide a representation within prescribed timelines, with escalation if no decision was taken. The Court found those timelines were not followed and held that the risky exporter tag could not continue indefinitely on a mere investigative suspicion, as that would obstruct exports without adjudication. The representation was therefore required to be considered expeditiously on merits after affording a personal hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2025 13:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702616" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 980 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433233</link>
      <description>The circular on risky exporter cases required the authorities to decide a representation within prescribed timelines, with escalation if no decision was taken. The Court found those timelines were not followed and held that the risky exporter tag could not continue indefinitely on a mere investigative suspicion, as that would obstruct exports without adjudication. The representation was therefore required to be considered expeditiously on merits after affording a personal hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433233</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>