<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 952 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433205</link>
    <description>Where the material facts were unchanged from earlier years and the Indian company acted independently, no dependent agent permanent establishment arose in India. The Tribunal followed its consistent view in the assessee&#039;s own case, found no contrary decision, and held that the royalty income could not be taxed in India on the basis of agency PE attribution. The foreign enterprise therefore remained outside Indian taxability on this ground.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2023 18:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702577" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 952 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433205</link>
      <description>Where the material facts were unchanged from earlier years and the Indian company acted independently, no dependent agent permanent establishment arose in India. The Tribunal followed its consistent view in the assessee&#039;s own case, found no contrary decision, and held that the royalty income could not be taxed in India on the basis of agency PE attribution. The foreign enterprise therefore remained outside Indian taxability on this ground.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433205</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>