https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433200 The court dismissed the petitions and pending applications, affirming that the delay in filing the complaint was not justified. It held that no further authorization was needed for the SFIO officers to file the complaint under the Companies Act. The limitation period commenced on 26.11.2007, and the complaint filed on 01.12.2008 was time-barred. The court found no valid reason to condone the delay, emphasizing that the Central Government's internal processes did not warrant an extension of the limitation period. en-us Thu, 19 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Jan 2023 10:11:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433200 The court dismissed the petitions and pending applications, affirming that the delay in filing the complaint was not justified. It held that no further authorization was needed for the SFIO officers to file the complaint under the Companies Act. The limitation period commenced on 26.11.2007, and the complaint filed on 01.12.2008 was time-barred. The court found no valid reason to condone the delay, emphasizing that the Central Government's internal processes did not warrant an extension of the limitation period. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 19 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433200