<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 946 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433199</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that no rent was payable to the landlord during the moratorium period and that the NCLT had exceeded its jurisdiction. The act of placing padlocks on the premises by the landlord was deemed a violation of the moratorium provisions. The Tribunal set aside the Impugned Order and disposed of the appeal with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2023 10:11:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702570" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 946 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433199</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that no rent was payable to the landlord during the moratorium period and that the NCLT had exceeded its jurisdiction. The act of placing padlocks on the premises by the landlord was deemed a violation of the moratorium provisions. The Tribunal set aside the Impugned Order and disposed of the appeal with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433199</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>