https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433190 The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, upholding the liability of the appellant to pay service tax on advances received from clients. The denial of CENVAT credit on certain goods was set aside, as they were deemed essential for the appellant's services. The invocation of the extended period of limitation was upheld due to the appellant's actions indicating an intent to evade tax. en-us Fri, 20 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Jul 2023 12:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433190 The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, upholding the liability of the appellant to pay service tax on advances received from clients. The denial of CENVAT credit on certain goods was set aside, as they were deemed essential for the appellant's services. The invocation of the extended period of limitation was upheld due to the appellant's actions indicating an intent to evade tax. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 20 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433190