<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 928 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433181</link>
    <description>The accused failed to rebut the statutory presumption under Sections 118 and 139 of the N.I. Act. The High Court set aside the judgment of acquittal by the Trial Court and convicted the accused under Section 138 of the N.I. Act. The accused was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.2,00,000/- or undergo imprisonment for three months in default of payment. The Registry was directed to send a copy of the judgment and the Trial Court records back to the Trial Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2023 10:10:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702544" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 928 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433181</link>
      <description>The accused failed to rebut the statutory presumption under Sections 118 and 139 of the N.I. Act. The High Court set aside the judgment of acquittal by the Trial Court and convicted the accused under Section 138 of the N.I. Act. The accused was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.2,00,000/- or undergo imprisonment for three months in default of payment. The Registry was directed to send a copy of the judgment and the Trial Court records back to the Trial Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433181</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>