<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 1356 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306337</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of fees paid under Portfolio Management Scheme against Short Term Capital Gain, disallowance of depreciation and society charges on residential premises, and ad-hoc disallowance of expenses. One issue was referred back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. The appeal was partly allowed, confirming most of the disallowances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2023 18:51:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702536" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 1356 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306337</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of fees paid under Portfolio Management Scheme against Short Term Capital Gain, disallowance of depreciation and society charges on residential premises, and ad-hoc disallowance of expenses. One issue was referred back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. The appeal was partly allowed, confirming most of the disallowances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306337</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>