<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1633 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306341</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, providing full relief to the assessee. The Tribunal found that the assessee adequately proved the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the lender companies, while criticizing the AO for insufficient investigations and reliance on unsubstantiated inferences. Consequently, the remaining addition of Rs. 6,58,49,749/- was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2023 18:51:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702530" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1633 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306341</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, providing full relief to the assessee. The Tribunal found that the assessee adequately proved the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the lender companies, while criticizing the AO for insufficient investigations and reliance on unsubstantiated inferences. Consequently, the remaining addition of Rs. 6,58,49,749/- was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>