<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 1095 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306347</link>
    <description>The court set aside the order rejecting the petitioners&#039; discharge, directing their discharge from the case. The exoneration in departmental proceedings, addressing the same facts, rendered the criminal charges groundless. The court emphasized that the lower standard of proof in departmental proceedings impacted the sustainability of criminal prosecution, citing relevant case law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2023 18:51:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702524" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 1095 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306347</link>
      <description>The court set aside the order rejecting the petitioners&#039; discharge, directing their discharge from the case. The exoneration in departmental proceedings, addressing the same facts, rendered the criminal charges groundless. The court emphasized that the lower standard of proof in departmental proceedings impacted the sustainability of criminal prosecution, citing relevant case law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306347</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>