<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 61 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31605</link>
    <description>Classification of the product &#039;Dant Mukta&#039; turned on whether it fell under tariff sub-heading 3306.90 or 3306.10 and whether the notified exemption was available. The Tribunal treated &#039;Dant Mukta&#039; and the identical product &#039;Dant Shakti&#039; as classifiable under Heading 3306.10, noting their use as raw material for manufacture of &#039;Lal Dant Manjan&#039;. The Supreme Court held the present appeals were covered by its earlier decision in the assessee&#039;s own case, where the Revenue&#039;s challenge to the same classification issue had already been dismissed on merits, and therefore affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s classification and the attendant exemption benefit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70252" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 61 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31605</link>
      <description>Classification of the product &#039;Dant Mukta&#039; turned on whether it fell under tariff sub-heading 3306.90 or 3306.10 and whether the notified exemption was available. The Tribunal treated &#039;Dant Mukta&#039; and the identical product &#039;Dant Shakti&#039; as classifiable under Heading 3306.10, noting their use as raw material for manufacture of &#039;Lal Dant Manjan&#039;. The Supreme Court held the present appeals were covered by its earlier decision in the assessee&#039;s own case, where the Revenue&#039;s challenge to the same classification issue had already been dismissed on merits, and therefore affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s classification and the attendant exemption benefit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>