<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 1290 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306329</link>
    <description>CTR Manufacturing Industries Ltd. was held not to be a valid transfer pricing comparable because its functional profile differed from the assessee&#039;s capacitor and resistor manufacturing segment and no comparable segmental data was available. The Tribunal therefore directed its exclusion from the comparables set. Payments for leased line and related IT infrastructure charges were treated as cost-to-cost reimbursements without markup and, following the assessee&#039;s earlier year, were held not to be royalty or any other sum chargeable to tax. As a result, no tax deduction was required under section 195 and the corresponding disallowance under section 40(a)(i) was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2023 11:04:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702495" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 1290 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306329</link>
      <description>CTR Manufacturing Industries Ltd. was held not to be a valid transfer pricing comparable because its functional profile differed from the assessee&#039;s capacitor and resistor manufacturing segment and no comparable segmental data was available. The Tribunal therefore directed its exclusion from the comparables set. Payments for leased line and related IT infrastructure charges were treated as cost-to-cost reimbursements without markup and, following the assessee&#039;s earlier year, were held not to be royalty or any other sum chargeable to tax. As a result, no tax deduction was required under section 195 and the corresponding disallowance under section 40(a)(i) was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306329</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>