<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 919 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433172</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition, stating that the allegations against the petitioner prima facie attracted Section 3 of the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002. The court emphasized that its observations were limited to the petition&#039;s disposal and did not interfere with the ongoing criminal prosecution. The connected miscellaneous petition was also closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2023 11:04:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702482" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 919 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433172</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition, stating that the allegations against the petitioner prima facie attracted Section 3 of the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002. The court emphasized that its observations were limited to the petition&#039;s disposal and did not interfere with the ongoing criminal prosecution. The connected miscellaneous petition was also closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433172</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>