<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 905 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433158</link>
    <description>A disputed claim for professional fees, where liability was contested and payments already appeared to have been made for the services rendered, was treated as unsuitable for determination in a summary insolvency proceeding under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The appellate tribunal found no reason to interfere with the adjudicating authority&#039;s disposal of the petition, including reliance on inherent powers, and left the claimant to pursue relief before the competent forum. The order under challenge was therefore sustained because the insolvency process was not the proper forum for resolving the balance-fee dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2023 08:44:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702466" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 905 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433158</link>
      <description>A disputed claim for professional fees, where liability was contested and payments already appeared to have been made for the services rendered, was treated as unsuitable for determination in a summary insolvency proceeding under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The appellate tribunal found no reason to interfere with the adjudicating authority&#039;s disposal of the petition, including reliance on inherent powers, and left the claimant to pursue relief before the competent forum. The order under challenge was therefore sustained because the insolvency process was not the proper forum for resolving the balance-fee dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433158</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>