<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 895 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433148</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, holding that Section 68 of the Income Tax Act applied as the transactions lacked genuineness and creditworthiness. The Tribunal found the share capital and premium transactions to be scandalous, involving round-tripping to artificially inflate reserves. Consequently, the Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, restoring the addition made by the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2023 08:43:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 895 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433148</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, holding that Section 68 of the Income Tax Act applied as the transactions lacked genuineness and creditworthiness. The Tribunal found the share capital and premium transactions to be scandalous, involving round-tripping to artificially inflate reserves. Consequently, the Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, restoring the addition made by the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>