<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 20 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31596</link>
    <description>The court held that income derived from the purchase and export of gold jewellery by a non-resident individual in India is taxable under Section 5(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the income is received and accrued in India. Explanation 1(b) to Section 9(1)(i) does not exempt the individual from tax liability. The court&#039;s ruling, delivered on November 19, 2008, affirmed the taxability of the income in India.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 12:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70243" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 20 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31596</link>
      <description>The court held that income derived from the purchase and export of gold jewellery by a non-resident individual in India is taxable under Section 5(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the income is received and accrued in India. Explanation 1(b) to Section 9(1)(i) does not exempt the individual from tax liability. The court&#039;s ruling, delivered on November 19, 2008, affirmed the taxability of the income in India.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31596</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>