<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1825 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306314</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Transfer Pricing Officer to re-examine various aspects of transfer pricing adjustments and disallowances. The Tribunal emphasized the need for verification of functional dissimilarities, related party transactions, and the nature of reimbursements to ensure compliance with the arm&#039;s length principle and tax laws.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2023 15:19:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702422" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1825 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306314</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the Transfer Pricing Officer to re-examine various aspects of transfer pricing adjustments and disallowances. The Tribunal emphasized the need for verification of functional dissimilarities, related party transactions, and the nature of reimbursements to ensure compliance with the arm&#039;s length principle and tax laws.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306314</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>