<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (8) TMI 1357 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306321</link>
    <description>The ITAT set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and remanded the issue to the AO to ascertain the actual utilization of the unutilized amount for charitable purposes in the next financial year. The AO was directed to grant the deduction if satisfied with the utilization. The ITAT clarified that the delay in filing the intimation for availing benefits under s.11(1) would not be viewed adversely. The appeal of the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2023 15:19:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702420" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (8) TMI 1357 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306321</link>
      <description>The ITAT set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and remanded the issue to the AO to ascertain the actual utilization of the unutilized amount for charitable purposes in the next financial year. The AO was directed to grant the deduction if satisfied with the utilization. The ITAT clarified that the delay in filing the intimation for availing benefits under s.11(1) would not be viewed adversely. The appeal of the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306321</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>