<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 44 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31594</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner, Bhubaneswar-II had jurisdiction over the Respondents for service tax assessment. However, the appeal filed by the Department was dismissed due to the invalid constitution of the Committee of Chief Commissioners. The Cross Objection by the Respondents was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 18:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70241" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 44 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31594</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner, Bhubaneswar-II had jurisdiction over the Respondents for service tax assessment. However, the appeal filed by the Department was dismissed due to the invalid constitution of the Committee of Chief Commissioners. The Cross Objection by the Respondents was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31594</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>