<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 875 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433128</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the impugned order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) under the wrong statutory provision was not maintainable. The appeal was allowed solely on the jurisdictional issue raised by the appellant, highlighting the necessity of filing appeals under the appropriate statutory provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2023 15:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702408" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 875 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433128</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the impugned order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) under the wrong statutory provision was not maintainable. The appeal was allowed solely on the jurisdictional issue raised by the appellant, highlighting the necessity of filing appeals under the appropriate statutory provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433128</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>