https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433099 A writ challenge to a PMLA confirmation order was held inappropriate where a statutory appeal lay to the Appellate Tribunal and the dispute involved contested facts on notice and the petitioner's knowledge; the court declined writ intervention and directed the petitioner to pursue the appellate remedy. On the objection that the confirmation order was passed after the prescribed 180-day period, the court held that authorities on Article 21 and Section 167(2) CrPC did not extend to property-rights proceedings under Article 300-A, and it left the limitation issue open for the Tribunal. The writ petition was therefore not entertained on merits. en-us Tue, 06 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Jan 2023 10:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433099 A writ challenge to a PMLA confirmation order was held inappropriate where a statutory appeal lay to the Appellate Tribunal and the dispute involved contested facts on notice and the petitioner's knowledge; the court declined writ intervention and directed the petitioner to pursue the appellate remedy. On the objection that the confirmation order was passed after the prescribed 180-day period, the court held that authorities on Article 21 and Section 167(2) CrPC did not extend to property-rights proceedings under Article 300-A, and it left the limitation issue open for the Tribunal. The writ petition was therefore not entertained on merits. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 06 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433099