<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 71 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31589</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted condonation of delay in filing an appeal under Section 86 of the Finance Act, 1994. The delay of 441 days was attributed to the Chief Commissioner&#039;s decision, which lacked legal sanctity. The Tribunal found the delay not deliberate or intentional, allowing the condonation application. It clarified that the subsequent decision did not amount to a review and tagged the appeal for further proceedings with other Service Tax Appeal numbers. The decision was based on the lack of deliberate intent in the delay and procedural errors in decision-making.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 20:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 71 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31589</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted condonation of delay in filing an appeal under Section 86 of the Finance Act, 1994. The delay of 441 days was attributed to the Chief Commissioner&#039;s decision, which lacked legal sanctity. The Tribunal found the delay not deliberate or intentional, allowing the condonation application. It clarified that the subsequent decision did not amount to a review and tagged the appeal for further proceedings with other Service Tax Appeal numbers. The decision was based on the lack of deliberate intent in the delay and procedural errors in decision-making.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31589</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>