<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (11) TMI 545 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306302</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, stating that the debenture redemption reserve should be treated as a provision and not included in the capital computation for surtax purposes. However, the Court directed the Tribunal to reassess the matter to determine if any excess amount beyond the known liability could be considered as a reserve and included in the capital computation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2023 16:52:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (11) TMI 545 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306302</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, stating that the debenture redemption reserve should be treated as a provision and not included in the capital computation for surtax purposes. However, the Court directed the Tribunal to reassess the matter to determine if any excess amount beyond the known liability could be considered as a reserve and included in the capital computation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306302</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>