<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 840 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433093</link>
    <description>HC allowed partial relief to payment gateway service provider, permitting business operations while maintaining account freeze. Respondents agreed to review merchant objections within two weeks. Court balanced concerns about fund legitimacy with business continuity, reserving all parties&#039; rights and enabling potential future legal recourse.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2025 11:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702328" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 840 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433093</link>
      <description>HC allowed partial relief to payment gateway service provider, permitting business operations while maintaining account freeze. Respondents agreed to review merchant objections within two weeks. Court balanced concerns about fund legitimacy with business continuity, reserving all parties&#039; rights and enabling potential future legal recourse.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433093</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>