<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 833 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433086</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the reassessment under section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was unjustified as the Assessing Officer failed to provide tangible reasons for reopening the assessment to the assessee. The lack of reasons hindered the assessee&#039;s ability to object effectively, leading to the decision that the reopening was unwarranted. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside, with the case outcome favoring the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2023 09:16:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702318" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 833 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433086</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the reassessment under section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was unjustified as the Assessing Officer failed to provide tangible reasons for reopening the assessment to the assessee. The lack of reasons hindered the assessee&#039;s ability to object effectively, leading to the decision that the reopening was unwarranted. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside, with the case outcome favoring the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433086</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>