<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Cash Payment Disallowance to MSEDCL Franchise Contested; Rule 6DD(b) Supports Reversal of CPC and Tax Commissioner&#039;s Decision.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=67828</link>
    <description>addition on the basis of information displayed on the website of the sale tax department. - MSEDCL is a State under Article 12 of the Constitution and the cash payments made to its franchise/agent is covered under Rule 6DD(b) of the Rules. Therefore, the disallowance made by the CPC and as confirmed by the CIT(A) is not justified. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2023 09:15:30 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2023 09:15:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702303" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Cash Payment Disallowance to MSEDCL Franchise Contested; Rule 6DD(b) Supports Reversal of CPC and Tax Commissioner&#039;s Decision.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=67828</link>
      <description>addition on the basis of information displayed on the website of the sale tax department. - MSEDCL is a State under Article 12 of the Constitution and the cash payments made to its franchise/agent is covered under Rule 6DD(b) of the Rules. Therefore, the disallowance made by the CPC and as confirmed by the CIT(A) is not justified. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2023 09:15:30 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=67828</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>