<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 799 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433052</link>
    <description>The HC set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the revisionist on both issues. It found the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation of the works contract unsustainable due to the lack of segregation between material supply and works contract in the agreement. The notification dated 27.4.1987 was deemed inapplicable, supporting the revisionist&#039;s position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2024 17:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702270" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 799 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433052</link>
      <description>The HC set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the revisionist on both issues. It found the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation of the works contract unsustainable due to the lack of segregation between material supply and works contract in the agreement. The notification dated 27.4.1987 was deemed inapplicable, supporting the revisionist&#039;s position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433052</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>