<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 161 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31580</link>
    <description>Wet cleaning charges were not added to the taxable value of dry cleaning service for service tax purposes, because the invoice copies issued to customers were stamped to reflect wet cleaning and the original copies were collected at delivery. On that factual basis, the lower authority had held that the wet cleaning component could not be included in the valuation of the dry cleaning service, and the appeal was found to have no merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70227" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 161 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31580</link>
      <description>Wet cleaning charges were not added to the taxable value of dry cleaning service for service tax purposes, because the invoice copies issued to customers were stamped to reflect wet cleaning and the original copies were collected at delivery. On that factual basis, the lower authority had held that the wet cleaning component could not be included in the valuation of the dry cleaning service, and the appeal was found to have no merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31580</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>