<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 795 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433048</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision to allow the respondents to introduce additional evidence in the Section 34 proceedings. The Court stressed the importance of swift resolution of arbitration disputes and instructed the lower court to promptly reach a final decision on the Section 34 application. The appeal was dismissed, with no cost orders issued.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2023 07:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702264" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 795 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433048</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision to allow the respondents to introduce additional evidence in the Section 34 proceedings. The Court stressed the importance of swift resolution of arbitration disputes and instructed the lower court to promptly reach a final decision on the Section 34 application. The appeal was dismissed, with no cost orders issued.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433048</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>