<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (12) TMI 1418 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306284</link>
    <description>Where the assessee&#039;s receipts raised the same taxability question already decided in its own earlier year and covered by binding jurisdictional High Court precedent, the Tribunal followed the coordinate bench and High Court rulings and held that the income was not chargeable to tax in India, including as royalties under the Act and the India-USA DTAA. The appeal was allowed and the assessment was set aside to the extent inconsistent with that finding.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2023 07:16:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (12) TMI 1418 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306284</link>
      <description>Where the assessee&#039;s receipts raised the same taxability question already decided in its own earlier year and covered by binding jurisdictional High Court precedent, the Tribunal followed the coordinate bench and High Court rulings and held that the income was not chargeable to tax in India, including as royalties under the Act and the India-USA DTAA. The appeal was allowed and the assessment was set aside to the extent inconsistent with that finding.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>