<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 1464 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306282</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee. The disallowance under Section 14A was vacated due to the lack of recorded satisfaction by the Assessing Officer (A.O) and Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT(A)). Additionally, the Tribunal directed the A.O to allow the deduction of education cess based on the Bombay High Court&#039;s judgment in Sesa Goa Limited.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2023 07:16:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702258" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 1464 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306282</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee. The disallowance under Section 14A was vacated due to the lack of recorded satisfaction by the Assessing Officer (A.O) and Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT(A)). Additionally, the Tribunal directed the A.O to allow the deduction of education cess based on the Bombay High Court&#039;s judgment in Sesa Goa Limited.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306282</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>