<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (11) TMI 1093 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306278</link>
    <description>The appeal by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax was partly allowed, reinstating Accentia Technologies Ltd. as a comparable company. The exclusions of Acropetal Technologies Ltd., Eclerx Services Ltd., Infosys BPO Ltd., and TCS E-Serve Ltd. were upheld. The cross objection by the assessee on various grounds was mostly not pressed except for the working capital adjustment issue, which was dismissed. The final order was pronounced on 19/11/2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2023 07:16:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702254" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (11) TMI 1093 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306278</link>
      <description>The appeal by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax was partly allowed, reinstating Accentia Technologies Ltd. as a comparable company. The exclusions of Acropetal Technologies Ltd., Eclerx Services Ltd., Infosys BPO Ltd., and TCS E-Serve Ltd. were upheld. The cross objection by the assessee on various grounds was mostly not pressed except for the working capital adjustment issue, which was dismissed. The final order was pronounced on 19/11/2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306278</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>