<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 2015 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306286</link>
    <description>The court quashed the process against the petitioner as he was not involved in the alleged offences and acted within his duties as a marketing agent. The court highlighted that key officials responsible for recommending MSMEs were not facing trial, absolving the petitioner of liability for conspiracy or other offences. The order issuing process against the petitioner was deemed unsustainable and was consequently quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2023 07:16:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702241" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 2015 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306286</link>
      <description>The court quashed the process against the petitioner as he was not involved in the alleged offences and acted within his duties as a marketing agent. The court highlighted that key officials responsible for recommending MSMEs were not facing trial, absolving the petitioner of liability for conspiracy or other offences. The order issuing process against the petitioner was deemed unsustainable and was consequently quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306286</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>