<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 2015 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306286</link>
    <description>Process for offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act and IPC was held unsustainable where the petitioner&#039;s role was confined to facilitating coal delivery as a marketing agent on the basis of lists and recommendations supplied by the DIC and nodal agency. The court found no material showing that he identified MSMEs, prepared or manipulated the list, inserted any bogus unit, created false documents, altered quantities, or personally diverted coal. As the alleged conspiracy rested on the foundational bogus-list exercise and the officials connected with that stage were no longer in the case, the petitioner could not be proceeded against merely for his later facilitative role. The process was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2023 07:16:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702241" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 2015 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306286</link>
      <description>Process for offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act and IPC was held unsustainable where the petitioner&#039;s role was confined to facilitating coal delivery as a marketing agent on the basis of lists and recommendations supplied by the DIC and nodal agency. The court found no material showing that he identified MSMEs, prepared or manipulated the list, inserted any bogus unit, created false documents, altered quantities, or personally diverted coal. As the alleged conspiracy rested on the foundational bogus-list exercise and the officials connected with that stage were no longer in the case, the petitioner could not be proceeded against merely for his later facilitative role. The process was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306286</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>