<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 792 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433045</link>
    <description>HC partly allowed petition challenging refund rejection. Authorities incorrectly applied GST circulars regarding limitation period for filing refund application. Court set aside appellate order and remanded matter for fresh consideration on merits within 30 days, without expressing opinion on substantive claims. Procedural errors in refund application processing were rectified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2025 11:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 792 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433045</link>
      <description>HC partly allowed petition challenging refund rejection. Authorities incorrectly applied GST circulars regarding limitation period for filing refund application. Court set aside appellate order and remanded matter for fresh consideration on merits within 30 days, without expressing opinion on substantive claims. Procedural errors in refund application processing were rectified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433045</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>