<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 789 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433042</link>
    <description>The Madras HC dismissed the State&#039;s review application seeking reversal of transitioned tax deducted at source under Section 140(1) of TNGST Act. The State re-argued that transition is unavailable where credit is not admissible as input tax credit under the Act&#039;s proviso. The Court noted this identical argument was previously considered in its February 2021 order, which relied on Telangana HC&#039;s decision in Magma Fincorp Limited case regarding similar GST provisions. The Court held the State was attempting to re-agitate the same issue from original litigation, and review was not the appropriate remedy for challenging the earlier legal conclusion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2025 13:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702177" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 789 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433042</link>
      <description>The Madras HC dismissed the State&#039;s review application seeking reversal of transitioned tax deducted at source under Section 140(1) of TNGST Act. The State re-argued that transition is unavailable where credit is not admissible as input tax credit under the Act&#039;s proviso. The Court noted this identical argument was previously considered in its February 2021 order, which relied on Telangana HC&#039;s decision in Magma Fincorp Limited case regarding similar GST provisions. The Court held the State was attempting to re-agitate the same issue from original litigation, and review was not the appropriate remedy for challenging the earlier legal conclusion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433042</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>