<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 788 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433041</link>
    <description>HC ruled in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the detention order for UPVC windows. The court found that the &quot;Bill to - Ship to&quot; transaction was legitimate, with all necessary GST details properly disclosed. The judge emphasized that the transaction was not tax evasive and ordered immediate release of the detained consignment without imposing costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2025 10:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702176" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 788 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433041</link>
      <description>HC ruled in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the detention order for UPVC windows. The court found that the &quot;Bill to - Ship to&quot; transaction was legitimate, with all necessary GST details properly disclosed. The judge emphasized that the transaction was not tax evasive and ordered immediate release of the detained consignment without imposing costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>