<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 760 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433013</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition under short-term capital gains and reject the addition towards unexplained credits under section 68 of the Act. The Tribunal found that the AO lacked sufficient evidence to support the additions and did not establish the necessary nexus between the entries in the seized documents and the assessee. The appeal filed by the revenue was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2023 08:38:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702148" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 760 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433013</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition under short-term capital gains and reject the addition towards unexplained credits under section 68 of the Act. The Tribunal found that the AO lacked sufficient evidence to support the additions and did not establish the necessary nexus between the entries in the seized documents and the assessee. The appeal filed by the revenue was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>