<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 756 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433009</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that the assessee was entitled to the deduction under section 80IB despite outsourcing part of the manufacturing process, as the primary conditions of the section were met. The order was pronounced in the open court on 30.11.2022.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2023 11:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702144" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 756 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433009</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that the assessee was entitled to the deduction under section 80IB despite outsourcing part of the manufacturing process, as the primary conditions of the section were met. The order was pronounced in the open court on 30.11.2022.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>