<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 750 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433003</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed as the court found that the import was not improper, the goods were in order, and the PSI certificate was complete. The Branch Office&#039;s issuance of the certificate was later ratified by the DGFT. Consequently, the court rejected the redemption fine and penalty imposed by the authorities, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal with consequential benefits as per law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2023 12:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702138" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 750 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433003</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed as the court found that the import was not improper, the goods were in order, and the PSI certificate was complete. The Branch Office&#039;s issuance of the certificate was later ratified by the DGFT. Consequently, the court rejected the redemption fine and penalty imposed by the authorities, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal with consequential benefits as per law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433003</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>