https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433000 Availability of an alternate remedy does not automatically bar writ jurisdiction under Article 226 where the challenge raises jurisdictional concerns or the impugned action appears prima facie arbitrary or inadequately reasoned. A suspension order based only on the pendency of a criminal case and filing of a charge-sheet, without any finding of guilt, was treated as prima facie unsustainable because mere accusation cannot by itself finally negate fitness, integrity, or propriety. On those facts, the writ court was held entitled to intervene and keep the order in abeyance pending final hearing. en-us Thu, 12 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Jan 2023 08:37:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433000 Availability of an alternate remedy does not automatically bar writ jurisdiction under Article 226 where the challenge raises jurisdictional concerns or the impugned action appears prima facie arbitrary or inadequately reasoned. A suspension order based only on the pendency of a criminal case and filing of a charge-sheet, without any finding of guilt, was treated as prima facie unsustainable because mere accusation cannot by itself finally negate fitness, integrity, or propriety. On those facts, the writ court was held entitled to intervene and keep the order in abeyance pending final hearing. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Thu, 12 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433000