<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 745 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432998</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the debt claimed by SDMC qualifies as an &#039;operational debt&#039; under the IBC. However, due to the existence of &#039;pre-existing disputes&#039; between SDMC and MEP Infrastructure regarding the Toll Tax Agreement, the section 9 application was rejected. The appeal was dismissed, and the Impugned Order was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2023 12:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 745 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432998</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the debt claimed by SDMC qualifies as an &#039;operational debt&#039; under the IBC. However, due to the existence of &#039;pre-existing disputes&#039; between SDMC and MEP Infrastructure regarding the Toll Tax Agreement, the section 9 application was rejected. The appeal was dismissed, and the Impugned Order was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=432998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>