<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1623 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306244</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to tax the deemed dividend in the hands of the individual director with substantial interest in the payer company, rather than the partnership firm. The issue was remitted back to the CIT(A) for further verification and clarification on the source of the shares invested by the director.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2023 08:36:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702110" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1623 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306244</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to tax the deemed dividend in the hands of the individual director with substantial interest in the payer company, rather than the partnership firm. The issue was remitted back to the CIT(A) for further verification and clarification on the source of the shares invested by the director.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>