https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306260 The court quashed the provisional attachment orders dated March 25, 2021, and March 26, 2021, as they did not meet the legal requirements outlined in the Radha Krishan case. The court found the orders to be cryptic, unreasoned, non-speaking, and laconic. Additionally, the court addressed the respondents' concerns about non-payment of taxes by noting the substantial immovable property assets owned by the petitioners. The petition was allowed, the impugned orders were quashed, and the respondents were given liberty to take lawful action based on the judgment's observations. en-us Thu, 12 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Jan 2023 11:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306260 The court quashed the provisional attachment orders dated March 25, 2021, and March 26, 2021, as they did not meet the legal requirements outlined in the Radha Krishan case. The court found the orders to be cryptic, unreasoned, non-speaking, and laconic. Additionally, the court addressed the respondents' concerns about non-payment of taxes by noting the substantial immovable property assets owned by the petitioners. The petition was allowed, the impugned orders were quashed, and the respondents were given liberty to take lawful action based on the judgment's observations. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 12 Aug 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306260