https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306258 In a toll-collection contract, the force majeure regime was treated as operative from 26.03.2020 under the governmental COVID-19 response and later tolling directions, without requiring a separate notice. Accrued arrears up to 25.03.2020 remained payable, but the weekly remittance obligation was modified and suspended from 26.03.2020 until traffic recovered to 90% of the pre-lockdown level, with deposits to be made after permitted deductions. A termination notice issued by the municipal authority was upheld as timely on the Court's calculation, and appointment of a retired Judge to decide the disputes was declined, leaving the writ proceedings to continue before the Single Judge. en-us Fri, 06 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Jan 2023 08:36:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306258 In a toll-collection contract, the force majeure regime was treated as operative from 26.03.2020 under the governmental COVID-19 response and later tolling directions, without requiring a separate notice. Accrued arrears up to 25.03.2020 remained payable, but the weekly remittance obligation was modified and suspended from 26.03.2020 until traffic recovered to 90% of the pre-lockdown level, with deposits to be made after permitted deductions. A termination notice issued by the municipal authority was upheld as timely on the Court's calculation, and appointment of a retired Judge to decide the disputes was declined, leaving the writ proceedings to continue before the Single Judge. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 06 Nov 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306258