https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306264 The article examines correction, review, and further criminal action in a Supreme Court matter involving alleged cognizable offences against public servants. The Court allowed correction of an ambiguous sentence that was part of the factual narration. On review, it reiterated that review is confined to patent error and is not an appeal in disguise; the majority dismissed the petitions, while a separate opinion treated the binding FIR-registration law as potentially relevant subject to Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act. No direction for FIR registration or further proceedings was issued in the majority view, and the complaint was left to the limits imposed by the statutory bar. en-us Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Jan 2023 08:36:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306264 The article examines correction, review, and further criminal action in a Supreme Court matter involving alleged cognizable offences against public servants. The Court allowed correction of an ambiguous sentence that was part of the factual narration. On review, it reiterated that review is confined to patent error and is not an appeal in disguise; the majority dismissed the petitions, while a separate opinion treated the binding FIR-registration law as potentially relevant subject to Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act. No direction for FIR registration or further proceedings was issued in the majority view, and the complaint was left to the limits imposed by the statutory bar. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306264