https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306264 Review jurisdiction is confined to patent error, miscarriage of justice, or analogous grounds and cannot operate as a rehearing. Non-consideration of binding law requiring FIR registration where cognizable offences are disclosed may constitute an apparent error, but relief remains constrained by the limited scope of review. Allegations concerning public servants' official recommendations or decisions are also subject to the requirement of prior approval before enquiry, inquiry, or investigation under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The review challenge was dismissed by majority, with no direction for FIR registration or criminal proceedings; a factual-narration sentence was corrected, and contempt proceedings were closed with caution. en-us Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Jan 2023 08:36:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306264 Review jurisdiction is confined to patent error, miscarriage of justice, or analogous grounds and cannot operate as a rehearing. Non-consideration of binding law requiring FIR registration where cognizable offences are disclosed may constitute an apparent error, but relief remains constrained by the limited scope of review. Allegations concerning public servants' official recommendations or decisions are also subject to the requirement of prior approval before enquiry, inquiry, or investigation under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The review challenge was dismissed by majority, with no direction for FIR registration or criminal proceedings; a factual-narration sentence was corrected, and contempt proceedings were closed with caution. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306264