<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1775 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306264</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the correction sought by the Union of India regarding errors in the judgment related to Rafale fighter jets procurement. Review petitions and an application under Section 340 of CrPC were dismissed, finding no substantial material for prosecution. The Court emphasized limited judicial review in procurement matters, noting competitive pricing and the final authority&#039;s decision-making role. Contempt proceedings against a political leader for misrepresenting the Court&#039;s judgment were closed with a cautionary note, following an unconditional apology. The judgment underscores the Court&#039;s commitment to decision integrity, accountability, and responsible public discourse.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2023 08:36:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=702096" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1775 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306264</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the correction sought by the Union of India regarding errors in the judgment related to Rafale fighter jets procurement. Review petitions and an application under Section 340 of CrPC were dismissed, finding no substantial material for prosecution. The Court emphasized limited judicial review in procurement matters, noting competitive pricing and the final authority&#039;s decision-making role. Contempt proceedings against a political leader for misrepresenting the Court&#039;s judgment were closed with a cautionary note, following an unconditional apology. The judgment underscores the Court&#039;s commitment to decision integrity, accountability, and responsible public discourse.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306264</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>